We take your privacy seriously. No spam. See our privacy policy here. Nate is passionate about and loves learning new things everyday about snowboarding, particularly the technical aspects of snowboarding gear.
That, and becoming a better rider and just enjoying and getting the most out of life. I was wondering how the union mini disc compare to the reflex in terms of response, board feel etc. Love all the content, thank you for all the in-depth replies and reviews. The discussion with Florian was also really helpful, thank you both!
In terms of response, I think it really depends on the model. Maybe overall the mini-disc feels a little more responsive. And I only say that because I find flex-for-flex that Union bindings mini-disc or not however tend to be a little more responsive, by my feel. But there are other factors involved too. And it really largely depends on the model.
Thanks Nate!! Hi Nate I just wanted to ask you why you think that est-bindings arent as shockabsorbant than the reflex versions? Shouldnt there be more room for EVA-material since there is only a small strip of hard plastic under your footpads and the rest is just EVA-foam. So why do you think the reflex bindings are more shockabsorbant? BTW thx for your detailed reviews. There is thicker padding in the heel in Re:Flex models — which is, IMO, the most important area for shock absorption.
The padding in the heel on EST bindings is quite thin. That thinness — and the fact that most of the footbeds is just foam, is a large reason, IMO, why EST models tend to have a little better board feel than Re:Flex. Thx for your answer. On the other hand I see a problem with the reflex bindings and thats the mechanism to put your gaspedal forward. If you have to put it on the most forward klick like me there is alot of room exposed directly under the heel.
Also this causes the EVA foam to wear away more quickly. The solution of the Est bindings seems way more logical. This lead me to believe that the Est would give me more shock absorbtion than my current reflex bindings.
I guess I will see soon enough since i just bought some Diodes and Cartels in the Est version. I bougt both used and plan to build some frankenbindings for my burton powder deck. Could you test those out? Did you like them? Snowboard gear is addictive for sure! On my pow deck i didnt really notice a difference to be honest since I only rode that one in pow and very soft snow.
Unfortunately, I couldnt do a direct A-B-comparison since I didnt bring my reflex bindings with me but I am really familiar with the reflex bindings because I rode them almost exklusively for the last years.
So which one is more shockabsorbant? I really dont think there is much of a difference between the two. How does this transalte to feel? I really couldnt tell a difference maybe in a direct test where I would change bindings at the bottom of a slope. Its more the chatter absorbation which feels different though than the slow hard impact like hitting a knuckle, there I would say they are pretty even maybe the reflex has some tiny advantages?
Idk…Burton bindings in general are really good regarding shock absorbation. The fact that with the EST-Bindings you really stand on pretty much just EVA-foam does reduce chatter at speeds a bit better if you ask me.
This also translates to a different feel of the bindings overall. That being said I cant really put my finger on what exactly is different. Maybe the hinge also contribiutes to this difference in feel.. That felt entirely different. The discs on normal Burton bindings are made to accommodate this, and therefore Burton disc bindings non EST from any year are the ideal match for any board with a 3-D Pattern. This means that those Burton disc bindings you picked up from a few years back will still work with any new Burton 3-D board.
The Burton Step On Bindings get you snowboarding quick. They require the Burton Step On boots and allow you to easily slide your boot in and click your heel into place.
An average snowboard should last a rider between and days of riding. Binding Compatibility with Snowboards There are a variety of mounting options and hole patterns on snowboards. Step On boots are designed to work with Step On bindings, and are not designed to be used with any other bindings, including traditional strap bindings.
Gravity is exerting a force on your mass and pulling it downhill. The only thing stopping you is friction between the board base and the snow. Burton made 3D board for much longer than that — at least until maybe even more recently. Only on boards intended to slot into existing rental fleets using 3D. Burton 3-D The discs on normal Burton bindings are made to accommodate this, and therefore Burton disc bindings non EST from any year are the ideal match for any board with a 3-D Pattern.
The Burton Channel is a mounting system that contains two channels in the board one for each foot that run parallel to the edges. Traditional boards have binding inserts where the channel is located. The bindings mount in a channel instead of the more traditional threaded holes in the board. If you see two long channels down the middle of the board than you need EST bindings. If you see screw holes than you need normal bindings.
Flow bindings came along to improve ease of use and may be marginally quicker to put on. Many riders seem to find that traditional bindings provide more control, are easier to adjust, and are actually just as easy to put on a lot of the time. Both types have their advantages and drawbacks.
The Burton Step On Bindings get you snowboarding quick. They require the Burton Step On boots and allow you to easily slide your boot in and click your heel into place. Binding Compatibility with Snowboards There are a variety of mounting options and hole patterns on snowboards. Flow bindings come in different sizes, bring your boots with you when you purchase your bindings and you will get the proper fit, as well there is a size range on the box of the bindings.
0コメント